Case-law & statutory research
Research that connects the judgment to your issue.
Ask a question in plain language and get an answer grounded in law, separated by source class — statute, judicial interpretation and administrative guidance — with citations you can open, and the proposition matched against your facts.
Research across 20,000+ Indian tax judgments, supported by Acts, Rules, CBDT circulars, notifications, instructions and authoritative guidance.
How it works
Five steps, one complete case
- 01
Ask in plain language
A section, a proposition, or a fact pattern — no special syntax.
- 02
Retrieve the authority
Relevant judgments and the black-letter provision are surfaced from the verified corpus.
- 03
Separate the sources
Statute, judicial interpretation and administrative guidance are kept distinct in the answer.
- 04
Open every citation
Each reference is source-linked — open the judgment or read the provision inline.
- 05
Apply it to the facts
The proposition is connected to your issue, with the match and the distinction shown.
An anonymised example
Law connects to the actual issue
A judgment's proposition matched — and distinguished — against the facts of the case.
Proposition
Where the assessee establishes identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, an addition u/s 68 cannot be sustained.
▉▉▉▉ v. CIT — ITAT [1]Applied to this case
- MatchIdentity of creditors proved (PAN + confirmations)
- MatchGenuineness — banking channel
- DistinctionCreditworthiness not yet evidenced
A judgment's proposition is connected to the actual issue — where the facts match, and where they differ.
What you get
Built for the work, not the demo
Judgments, Acts and Rules
Research across 20,000+ Indian tax judgments, supported by the Income-tax Act, Rules and CBDT material.
Source-linked citations
Every material claim carries a citation you can open — judgments to their page, provisions read inline.
Source-class separation
Statute, judicial interpretation, administrative guidance and inference are never blurred together.
Honest about freshness
Where a question depends on a development after the corpus window, Worknite says so and flags live verification.
No fabricated authority
If the corpus doesn't cover a point, it says so rather than inventing a case name or citation.
From research to case
When the question becomes a live matter, carry it into a complete case with evidence and drafts.
Questions
Frequently asked
How large is the corpus?
Research runs across 20,000+ Indian tax judgments, supported by the Income-tax Act, Rules, CBDT circulars, notifications, instructions and authoritative guidance. Answers are grounded in this verified corpus.
Can it invent a case that doesn't exist?
It is built not to. Answers cite only references retrieved from the corpus; where authority is missing, it says the point should be verified rather than fabricating a citation.
Is the research always up to date?
The corpus is current through a stated window. For a question depending on a very recent circular, form or amendment, Worknite flags it as needing live verification instead of guessing.
Does it cover GST?
Worknite focuses on Indian income-tax. GST and full ITR e-filing mechanics are outside its current scope; it will say so rather than fabricate procedure.